You can ask. But unless you have a strong enough case and the company is very willing to avoid going to court, there will be a good chance that they will refuse. Such an admission may damage their reputation and may constitute admissible evidence depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances in other civil or even criminal cases. To what extent is an out-of-court settlement not considered an admission of guilt? In some cases, confidential settlements of accounts are requested during the investigation. Federal courts may issue protection orders that prevent disclosure, but the party wishing to prevent disclosure must demonstrate that disclosure would result in harm or harm.  However, in some states, such as California, the burden lies with the party seeking authorization of the confidential transaction.  “In criminal cases, with the exception of those involving quasi-offenses (criminal negligence) or those that are in danger by law, an offer of compromise from the accused may be obtained as implicit evidence of guilt. xxx` The contract is based on the principle that a party waives its ability to appeal (if it has not already brought legal proceedings) or pursues the claim (if the applicant has brought an action), in exchange for the certainty established in comparison. The courts will enforce the transaction. If it is violated, the late party could be sued for breach of this contract.
In some jurisdictions, the defaulting party may also face the reinstatement of the original complaint. First, since the law promotes the out-of-court settlement of controversies, a person has the right to “buy his peace”, without risking bias if his efforts fail; Therefore, any communication made for this purpose is considered privileged. Indeed, if any offer to purchase peace could be used as evidence against a person who presents it, many comparisons would be avoided and unnecessary litigation would arise, for no prudent person would dare to offer or maintain a compromise if his position of compromise could be exploited as a commitment of weakness. An authorization made by a party under this rule serves only the subject matter of the pending appeal and is not an admission to another use, nor may it be used in any other proceedings against the party. “Second, compromise offers are irrelevant because they are not intended as confessions of the parties making them. A genuine offer of compromise does not imply, from a legal point of view, the admission of a defendant that he is legally liable, nor of a plaintiff, that his claim is unfounded, or even doubtful, insofar as it is made for the purpose of avoiding controversy and avoiding the costs of litigation. The distinguishing feature of a compromise offer is that it is made timidly, hypothetically and considering reciprocal concessions. . .